Computer Hardware Tutorials

Home| Forums | Join Google Group | Join Yahoo Group | Jobs
Get custom programming done at GetAFreelancer.com!
Earn Money
  Trading Forex Online
  Paramount Airways
  Free Data Recovery
 Cargo
 Job Portal
  HSBC Investment
 Management
 Cheap Web Hosting
  Make Trip
  Cheap Air Travel
 Leisure Hotel
  Free Air Travel
  Mutual Fund Informations
   Cheapest Cellular Plan
 Free Sexy Indians
  Call Center Software
  Hot Indian
Programming Help | Homework Help | Counseling
Astrology Advice | Tarot Advice | Parenting
Dating Advice | Love Advice | Divorce Advice
Legal Advice | Debt Advice | Career Advice
memory, the goal of a cache DRAM is to hold the most frequently used data in the SRAM cache to minimize accesses to the slower DRAM. One advantage to the on-chip SRAM is that a wider bus can be used between the SRAM and DRAM, effectively increasing the bandwidth and increasing the speed of the DRAM even when there is a cache miss. As with DDR SDRAM, there is currently at least one Socket 7 chipset with support for ESDRAM. The deciding factor in determining which of these solutions will succeed will likely be the initial cost of the modules. Current estimates show the cost of ESDRAM at about 4 times that of existing DRAM solutions, which will likely not go over well with most users. Protocol Based DRAM All of the previously discussed DRAM have separate address, data and control lines which limits the speed at which the device can operate with current technology. In order to overcome this limitation, several designs implement all of these signals on the same bus. The two protocol based designs currently getting the most attention are SyncLink DRAM (now called SLDRAM due to trademark issues) and Direct Rambus DRAM (DRDRAM) licensed by Rambus, Inc. DRDRAM Intel has placed their money on the proprietary memory design developed by Rambus, Inc. On the surface, this looks to be a very fast solution for system memory due to its fast operation (up to 800MHz). The reality is, however, that the design is only up to twice as fast as current SDRAM operation due to the smaller bus width (16 bits vs. 64 bits). Despite the claims from Intel and Rambus, Inc., there are some potentially serious issues which need to be addressed with this technology. The higher speeds require short wire lengths and additional shielding to prevent problems with EMI. In addition, latency times are actually worse than currently available fast SDRAM. Since most of today's applications do not actually utilize the full bandwidth of the memory bus even today, simply increasing the bandwidth while ignoring latency issues will likely not provide any real performance improvements. In addition, processors operating with 800MHz bus speeds will certainly require more than double the current memory bandwidth. While these issues are serious enough, the biggest drawback to the technology is that it is proprietary technology. Manufacturers wishing to implement a solution with DRDRAM will be required to pay a royalty to Intel and Rambus, Inc., and will also have no real control over the technology. This is not an attractive outlook for most memory manufacturers who have no desire to essentially become chip foundries. SLDRAM
Earn Money
  Trading Forex Online
  Paramount Airways
  Free Data Recovery
 Cargo
 Job Portal
  HSBC Investment
 Management
 Cheap Web Hosting
  Make Trip
  Cheap Air Travel
 Leisure Hotel
  Free Air Travel
  Mutual Fund Informations
   Cheapest Cellular Plan
 Free Sexy Indians
  Call Center Software
  Hot Indian